
June 2007
Audit trails show which of your claims were accepted by the Cahaba GBA Part B processing system, along with claims that were rejected and the reason for the rejection. Referring to this report will allow you to correct and resubmit claims quickly, resulting in a dramatically reduced turnaround time. You will also become aware of any major problems with your claims so they can be corrected before they create an interruption in your cash flow. Audit trail reports are available the next business day for files that are received before 3:30 p.m. Central Time. If you are not receiving your audit trails contact your software vendor, billing service, or clearing house.
For a more complete list of edits, along with descriptions of loops that might be referenced in an edit, please visit Audit Trail Edit Explanations.
In order to increase the number of claims that successfully pass through audit trails and into processing Cahaba GBA Part B EDI Services is providing you with the top five reasons for claim rejections. For the month of April 2007, these are:
The rendering provider number on the claim is not affiliated with the billing or pay-to provider number.
The provider number in the indicated loop is not valid. The invalid provider number used will appear in the text for the edit.
The last name submitted for the beneficiary does not match the last name we have on record for the HIC number on the claim. The beneficiary's last name must include apostrophes, spaces, hyphens, etc., if they appear in the beneficiary's last name on his or her Medicare card.
The first name submitted for the beneficiary does not match the first name we have on record for the HIC number on the claim. The beneficiary's first name must appear as it does on the beneficiary's Medicare card. This includes spaces, hyphens, apostrophes, etc.
The invalid diagnosis code will appear inside the parenthesis. Be sure that you are using the latest ICD-9 diagnosis codes, and that the code you are using is the most specific one. Also be sure that you are not using a date of service that is before the effective date of the diagnosis code